ghost rider spirit of vengeance in theaters

Ghost rider spirit of vengeance in theaters pro#

A mudança de comportamento dele seria interessante se o filme fosse razoável, mas como quase tudo é demasiadamente ruim, fica difícil associar isso como um fator isolado bom. Pra não dizer que tudo é ruim, a CGI do motoqueiro me parece legal.

Não há o menor desenvolvimento, apenas baseando-os em arquétipos pobres e fingindo que basta. A historia do filme anterior foi super ignorada, apenas para tapar os furos e não precisar justificá-los, afinal, é muito mais fácil só pegar o que interessa.

Cenas de medo, angustia, drama e 'psicóticas' se tornam cômico de tão pastelão que é.

Ghost rider spirit of vengeance in theaters pro#

Eu não sei, mas devem ter pago uma coxinha pro elenco, e dai já não dá pra esperar muita coisa. As atuações fazem jus ao tópico anterior. A cinematografia é confusa, forçando movimentos frenéticos e slowmotion a todo momento, com cortes e ângulos incompreensíveis. Eu não sei, mas devem ter pago É como se todos envolvidos nesse projeto estivessem perdidos, mas se recusassem a parar. É como se todos envolvidos nesse projeto estivessem perdidos, mas se recusassem a parar. So, in the long line of poor attempts, GRSOV ranks higher than Punisher: War Zone, Dolph Lundgren's Punisher and the original GR, but that's about it. Like the abysmal attempts at getting a good Punisher on film, the reality is, the Marvel Knights characters will never make interesting films as long as the focus is on the violent part of their characters rather than what makes them dark in the first place. In reality, he's great in action and graphically, but even Goyer's writing skills can't make him that interesting. In theory, he should make a bad-ass film protagonist. Ghost Rider is a pseudo interesting character to begin with. However, the bad is a mix of what is bad about film-making in general and the unmet expectations of comic book lovers for Marvel Knight characters in general. The action sequences were also top notch. I loved that they skimmed over the origin. He was much more of a character in this film. And with David Goyer writing, it was expected to be better. THING they gave us in the first film, not to mention they actually get the villain's appearance right this time, seriously, look it up, blackout actually looks like he does in the comics, i grew up on these comics, so did my brother, and this film has finally restored my faith that we, the devoted fans, can still be given the adaption that we deserve, and the sad thing is that most people on here overlook this. Ladies and gentlemen, how could you possibly prefer the first ghost rider movie? it had NOTHING to do with the comics, it just tried to stitch elements from TWO DIFFERENT STORY ARCS onto a mediocre western story which also has nothing to do with the comics, the first film just falls apart Ladies and gentlemen, how could you possibly prefer the first ghost rider movie? it had NOTHING to do with the comics, it just tried to stitch elements from TWO DIFFERENT STORY ARCS onto a mediocre western story which also has nothing to do with the comics, the first film just falls apart the moment it tries to move forward, spirit of vengeance, however, actually gets it right, neveldine/taylor mostly focus on ONLY ONE STORY ARC, that of johnny blaze, and the new appearance is ACTUALLY CREEPY, the VFX are phenomenal, and the rider's bike is ACTUALLY THE BIKE HE HAS IN THE COMICS, not some cheesy.